Info for you

Info for you
Menu

AOC Claims ‘Zero Evidence’ To Impeach Biden: Here’s The Evidence

It is, as Elon Musk says, as if AOC is just not that smart.

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, the socialist Representative from New York, had herself a day at the Biden impeachment inquiry hearings yesterday.

First, she questioned each of the three Republican witnesses as to whether they had “first-hand witness” testimony showing evidence of impeachable offenses by the President.

And, of course, barring their actually being on hand when Biden is handed a bag of money with a giant dollar sign on the front of it, then no, the testimony or evidence won’t be firsthand. We’re skeptical of the idea that Ocasio-Cortez even knows what firsthand means.

Then she took to the X social media platform to claim Republicans presented “zero evidence to impeach President Biden.”

RELATED: GOP Rep Obliterates Reporter Claiming No Evidence To Support Biden Impeachment – Americans Don’t See It Because ‘You Don’t Report On It’

No Evidence To Impeach Biden? Come On, Man!

Now, you just know Ocasio-Cortez thinks that her “grilling” of witnesses and her bold statement that there is no evidence to impeach President Biden are, in her mind, walk-off statements.

And who could blame her? The media will dutifully go to bat for her. And for Biden, for that matter.

Remember the wall-to-wall coverage of President Donald Trump’s impeachment proceedings? Gone.

The fact-checkers who scrutinized every statement in his defense? Now defending Biden every step of the way.

There is no independent press holding government accountable in this country any longer.

But we don’t play that game here at The Political Insider. Why? Because, unlike the legacy media, we are not the enemy of truth or the enemy of the people.

With that, there is a plethora of evidence supporting an inquiry to impeach Biden. And there is some solid evidence that he was a significant beneficiary of Hunter Biden’s business schemes, making him beholden to numerous foreign entities.

In fact, the word “beneficiary” is an important one.

Just days prior to Ocasio-Cortez claiming that there is “zero evidence” to impeach Biden, a report came out showing the President’s home address in Delaware was listed as a “beneficiary” of wires totaling more than $250,000 from Hunter Biden’s Chinese business partners in 2019.

In fact, those payments came just months after Biden announced his presidential campaign. Almost as if they were trying to curry favor with the Biden brand somehow in anticipation of his election. Huh.

Now, if you are the most ardent schill for the President (like CNN’s fact-checker Paul Reubens Daniel Dale) you might come back and say, “No, those are just payments to Hunter and while we were originally reticent to admit the President’s son is a greasy money whore for other nations, we can accept that fact now in order to defend our muse in the White House.”

You might say that. Just one problem.

Hunter was not living with his parents in Delaware at the time of the payments, he was living in California. We know this because of Hunter’s rejected sweetheart plea deal.

RELATED: Subpoenas Are Coming For The Biden Family – Including Possibly The President

The Beneficiary, The Brand, And The Big Guy

Aside from being a “beneficiary” of payments from China, there is plenty of other evidence to justify the effort to impeach President Biden.

According to reported photographs, visitor logs, and other documentation, President Biden personally met with at least 14 of Hunter’s business associates over 16 occasions between 2010 and 2018 – including associates from China, Russia, Kazakhstan, Ukraine, and Mexico.

Why? As part of an effort, according to Hunter Biden business associate Devon Archer, to sell their name.

Archer testified that the President personally interjected nearly two dozen times on phone calls and in personal meetings with his son’s business associates while serving as vice president as a means to sell “the brand.”

An IRS whistleblower’s testimony earlier this year revealed a WhatsApp message from Hunter threatening a foreign national and claiming that his father was sitting in the room with him at the time as a means to strong-arm him.

“I am sitting here with my father and we would like to understand why the commitment made has not been fulfilled,” Hunter told a Chinese businessman before issuing an explicit threat.

Archer also confirmed that the then-Vice President Biden met in 2014 with Russian billionaire Elena Baturina — the widow of the former mayor of Moscow — at a Georgetown café.

Hunter, according to a New York Post report last year, received over $100 million in investment backing from Baturina.

Coincidentally, Baturina was left off Biden’s Russia sanctions last year, which would seemingly be a clear-cut example of the President being compromised to the detriment of national security!

Democrats and the media want you to believe Biden never got a piece of that pie.

Biden has already admitted to using his position to pressure Ukraine to fire the country’s prosecutor for looking into a gas company connected with his son, Hunter.

It’s all on tape.

That prosecutor, by the way, was Viktor Shokin, who very recently accused Hunter and President Biden himself of accepting bribes.

If you are to believe Ocasio-Cortez, then you also have to ignore the shell bank accounts with at least $20 million from foreign sources to the Biden family.

Hell, we can go all the way back to one of the initial pieces of evidence from Hunter’s laptop that the media tried desperately to censor.

A 2017 email obtained by Fox News just prior to the 2020 presidential election appeared to outline a payout for the President in a joint venture with CEFC China Energy.

It included a proposed equity split of “20” for “H” and “10 held by H for the big guy?”

Tony Bobulinski, a former business associate of Hunter Biden, has insisted the “big guy” is a reference to Joe Biden, though that has not been confirmed elsewhere.

Biden’s the “brand.” He’s the “beneficiary.” And he’s the “big guy.”

But we’re supposed to believe there is “zero evidence” to impeach?

The only thing in short supply, the only thing that there is “zero” of, is integrity amongst Ocasio-Cortez, her Democrat colleagues, and the media.

Now is the time to support and share the sources you trust.
The Political Insider ranks #3 on Feedspot’s “100 Best Political Blogs and Websites.”

The post AOC Claims ‘Zero Evidence’ To Impeach Biden: Here’s The Evidence appeared first on The Political Insider.

Tagged